eetaylog Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 In court yesterday.. Barrister: How many times have you been sent off, can you say please? Four times? Terry: please, please, please, please. True That -> http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/john-...at-7936075.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wwwd Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 God he's a Plonker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidrick Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 That's properly funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EscortNreg Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Brilliant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wwwd Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 God he's a Plonker.Bloody censors, it was supposed to say bell end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naylor2006 Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 In court yesterday.. Barrister: How many times have you been sent off, can you say please? Four times? Terry: please, please, please, please. Thats awful English for a barrister to use, hes also leading the question which youre not supposed to do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eetaylog Posted July 13, 2012 Author Share Posted July 13, 2012 Not guilty innit http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-18827915 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eetaylog Posted July 13, 2012 Author Share Posted July 13, 2012 Apparently the rest of the Chelsea squad have turned up in court fully kitted to celebrate with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidrick Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 Apparently the rest of the Chelsea squad have turned up in court fully kitted to celebrate with him. Superb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeeWee Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 I was under the impression most thought (and still do think) terry was guilty of this accusation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naylor2006 Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 (edited) I was under the impression most thought (and still do think) terry was guilty of this accusation? It was never going to be proven in a Criminal Trial, he would have got a ban if the FA has just dealt with it but in court he can have the most expensive and most clever lawyer possible, I havent actually seen the footage again since I watched the game but my opinion remains the same as it always has and that was he was always going to be found not guilty in court, unless they found a sound recording etc. Pointless trial, haters gon hate, Chelsea fans gon not. Edited July 13, 2012 by Naylor2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeeWee Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 Pointless trial, haters gon hate, Chelsea fans gon not. I'm neither, just seems a feeble excuse that was made? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naylor2006 Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 Pointless trial, haters gon hate, Chelsea fans gon not. I'm neither, just seems a feeble excuse that was made? What the part about how Terry said 'did you think I called you a black c9nt?', therefore if any lip readers read what he said he had the excuse that he only repeated words that Anton did? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeeWee Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 Pointless trial, haters gon hate, Chelsea fans gon not. I'm neither, just seems a feeble excuse that was made? What the part about how Terry said 'did you think I called you a black c9nt?', therefore if any lip readers read what he said he had the excuse that he only repeated words that Anton did? Aye!Just an excuse to put reasonable doubt, which in turn will return become a not guilty verdict.Clever but doesn't make it right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naylor2006 Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 Pointless trial, haters gon hate, Chelsea fans gon not. I'm neither, just seems a feeble excuse that was made? What the part about how Terry said 'did you think I called you a black c9nt?', therefore if any lip readers read what he said he had the excuse that he only repeated words that Anton did? Aye!Just an excuse to put reasonable doubt, which in turn will return become a not guilty verdict.Clever but doesn't make it right. Yeh true, I didnt think lip reading has ever been admissible anyway. The thing that winds me up is that regardless of the trial and how the legal system works everyone will call him a Racist so and so and have been leading up to the trial also, he is now officially innocent however that means absolutely sod all. Comes with being a footballer I guess, Terry has been abused for years and as he said in the trial he just gets on with it. I dont really have an opinion on the guy either way also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now