ANT Posted July 23, 2004 Share Posted July 23, 2004 i am liking that alot mate.. not sure why a bit quicker than mine but i am well happy with mine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxdie Posted July 23, 2004 Author Share Posted July 23, 2004 (edited) MR2, twin entry turbo. k-reg. 64k. 244bhp. Spotless. Gorgeous. And a stunning drive! EDIT: i'll try and get some better pic, photofuckit bodged that one! Edited July 23, 2004 by foxdie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunk Posted July 23, 2004 Share Posted July 23, 2004 very nice matey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANDYC Posted July 23, 2004 Share Posted July 23, 2004 nice m8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxdie Posted July 23, 2004 Author Share Posted July 23, 2004 /\ better picture now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neil Posted July 23, 2004 Share Posted July 23, 2004 Looks very nice mate but is no escort Are you going to do anything to it or leave it as standard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxdie Posted July 23, 2004 Author Share Posted July 23, 2004 Its got a uprated clutch, and sports suspension and turbo timer. Thats all. The boost now goes passed the standard max on the standard guage. But im more than happy with the performance for the time being. But, eventually its gonna get airfilter, full system and BOV, possibly boost controller too. but it, sooooo unmolested at the mo, i feel like just leaving it standard. It does most cars off the lights at the mo, inc WRX's and porsche boxsters (the official 0-60 time for this car is 5.87 secs) in a straight, and when im used to the RW rear mounted engine, i'll have a better chance keeping up on the twistys too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lambo Posted July 23, 2004 Share Posted July 23, 2004 Very nice mate, i'm so jealous. You not fancy putting some bigger wheels on it, or keeping them small for acceleration?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
white_van_matt Posted July 23, 2004 Share Posted July 23, 2004 I like velly velly much! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxdie Posted July 23, 2004 Author Share Posted July 23, 2004 i think its been lowered, i've seen a couple running 17's and 18's quite easily, but they just look stoopid, car sits about foot off the floor with them on, but yeah, wanna keep the acceleration and drive quality the best i can. plus wheels are quite hard to get hold of. think its the offset. tyres are 225/55/15 rear and 195/55/15 front. Tyres gonna be interesting to find i suppose. Drinks fuel tho, 90 miles to half a tank (full tank =£37). and i've been driving it quite sensibly! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neil Posted July 23, 2004 Share Posted July 23, 2004 195/50/15 is the same as my bros astra. they are much more expensive compared to 195/50/15s for some reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sortedford Posted July 23, 2004 Share Posted July 23, 2004 f1 thats quite confusing i think you mean 225/50/15's looks smart mate, youll havbe to bring it to pod or somewhere when we go next Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O-Z Posted July 23, 2004 Share Posted July 23, 2004 i cant see the pic mate. how much did it set u back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxdie Posted July 23, 2004 Author Share Posted July 23, 2004 O-ZI got an absolute steal mate, £3500 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott_d Posted July 25, 2004 Share Posted July 25, 2004 very nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now