Posted June 5, 200519 yr I personally hate cyclists...I dont give a toss if it is better for the Environment I hate em Reasons - they constantly swerve in and out of traffic...knock your mirrors off....jump the lights..jump off the kerb without looking or warning....some have no lights at night.....and they dont have to pay tax for the stupid lanes that get painted in everywhere! I think they should ALL have to have insurance or have designated half footpath/ half cycle lanes rather than on the road..... What are your views.... To be insured or not ?
June 5, 200519 yr No not really then you might as well start with the motor powered scooters and mini motorbikes etc, what about kids stop all there fun, cant have a bike till a set date like cars dont see that working and dont call all cyclists, i sometime while its nice travel to work via a bike, not everyone are the same,
June 5, 200519 yr I hit a cyclist not to long ago. Believe me they should have insurance. They're so flippin sly, like checky. I remember when I use to ride my bike. It was always on the pavement. Now you get in trouble and told to ride in the road! What the ffff. Thats so dumb cos most of them are on a bike cos they haven't got a driving licence so how the hell are the gonna know the laws of the road/highway code etc.
June 5, 200519 yr Author No not really then you might as well start with the motor powered scooters and mini motorbikes etc, <{POST_SNAPBACK}> If you mean "Go Peds" the petrol ones have to be taxed and insured now They decided that just after i bought one Kids should be on the pavement and taught to dismount - like I was and did
June 5, 200519 yr If you run over a Cyclist at night and he dont have lights or is clearly visable you cant get done for it Pause for thought
June 5, 200519 yr Yes they should have insurance, there a bloody hazzard to the road! plus they can pay towards all them pointless cycle lanes......... what a complete waste of money they are!
June 5, 200519 yr cyclists wobble far to much. i nearly knock 3 kids over last year cause they had no lights. saw then at the last minute and just about missed them all. and dont get me started on horses!
June 5, 200519 yr No they shouldnt have insurance would be rediculous. Cycling proficiency should be mandatory though
June 5, 200519 yr If they had to have insurance wouldnt you have to licence them too - otherwise what would you take off em? Silly idea IMO, therefore blair will probably bring it in
June 5, 200519 yr If they had to have insurance wouldnt you have to licence them too - otherwise what would you take off em? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> money fines
June 5, 200519 yr Kids should be on the pavement and taught to dismount - like I was and did Me too It annoys me that all our money that we pay for road tax, etc, goes on lovely new cycle lanes, and we all end up driving over massive fcuking potholes and wrecking our cars driving on crappy roads.
June 5, 200519 yr something should be done about them but it'd be a waste of time for the police to follow through with it Edited June 5, 200519 yr by 85rob
Create an account or sign in to comment