foxdie Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 Plus you have to think they only come with around 105/115 bhp standard, and thats good enough for around 8/8.5s 0-60...<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Actaully the VTS is a 7sec car. And the same engine is in a 106 GTi, and thats a 6sec car because its lighter! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mk6 Si Ross Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Plus you have to think they only come with around 105/115 bhp standard, and thats good enough for around 8/8.5s 0-60...<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Actaully the VTS is a 7sec car. And the same engine is in a 106 GTi, and thats a 6sec car because its lighter!<{POST_SNAPBACK}> where'd you get ur figures from Paul, Jackanory???? Saxo 1.6VTS = 7.6 sec106 1.6 Gti 16v = 8.4 sec (Source, Parkers) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirsty Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 that sounds so nice! bet it still looks wank lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muzz Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Shame its a saxo . Would like to find the guy when me and a couple of mates have finished project astra though, pretty sure it would rinse him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muzz Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Shame its a saxo . Would like to find the guy when me and a couple of mates have finished project astra though, pretty sure it would rinse him. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well a good race anyways (PS how do i edit posts ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotteh Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Shame its a saxo . Would like to find the guy when me and a couple of mates have finished project astra though, pretty sure it would rinse him. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> aye if i get this new job and my gt4 goes under the spanner wud be interesting to see how it wud fare as i sed tho fox, its lighter but wud still lose out after 60/70 imo, bmw just has more power, regardless of how much heavier it is, off the mark ud expect the saxo to be quicker tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muzz Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Im also assuming the Scooby and M3 are standard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxdie Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Plus you have to think they only come with around 105/115 bhp standard, and thats good enough for around 8/8.5s 0-60...<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Actaully the VTS is a 7sec car. And the same engine is in a 106 GTi, and thats a 6sec car because its lighter!<{POST_SNAPBACK}> where'd you get ur figures from Paul, Jackanory???? Saxo 1.6VTS = 7.6 sec106 1.6 Gti 16v = 8.4 sec (Source, Parkers)<{POST_SNAPBACK}> It was my understanding 106's were faster than VTS' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lambo Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Yeah that's defo crail Ric Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g-spot Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Plus you have to think they only come with around 105/115 bhp standard, and thats good enough for around 8/8.5s 0-60...<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Actaully the VTS is a 7sec car. And the same engine is in a 106 GTi, and thats a 6sec car because its lighter!<{POST_SNAPBACK}> where'd you get ur figures from Paul, Jackanory???? Saxo 1.6VTS = 7.6 sec106 1.6 Gti 16v = 8.4 sec (Source, Parkers)<{POST_SNAPBACK}> It was my understanding 106's were faster than VTS'<{POST_SNAPBACK}> 106s are faster than vts parkers are full of crap peugeot stats for the gti ar 7.1 citreon stats for vts are 7.6, although in 2000 the ecu was changed to 3 plug from 1 plug and slight engine change were made and the newer engine produced 130 or better as standard compared to the 115 - 120 the 1 plug ecu produced Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g-spot Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 230ish bhp beating a 320 odd bhp m3? sorry but....lol? also i like how it doesnt show the end, u wud expect it to keep up for a bit being so light but the m3 wud of destroyed it past 60/70<{POST_SNAPBACK}> and what speed do you think they were doing then i can tell you it was considerably quicker than 60 infact the vts only started pulling on the m3 past 40 oh and the vts will pull all the way to 165 with the dogbox gear box where as the m3 is limited to 155 so the m3 would be destroyed at any speed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 230ish bhp beating a 320 odd bhp m3? sorry but....lol? also i like how it doesnt show the end, u wud expect it to keep up for a bit being so light but the m3 wud of destroyed it past 60/70<{POST_SNAPBACK}> and what speed do you think they were doing then i can tell you it was considerably quicker than 60 infact the vts only started pulling on the m3 past 40 oh and the vts will pull all the way to 165 with the dogbox gear box where as the m3 is limited to 155 so the m3 would be destroyed at any speed <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Lol , but i'd still rather have that BMW! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLING Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 ESC COS AL , do u reckon u could beat him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxdie Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 it says supercharged. But adding a supercharger wont give you 110bhp more, thats just ridiculas. i recon he's running NOS (and having 100shot of NOS doesnt equal 100bhp added directly to your standard figure) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AutomodellistaGT Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 i dont suspect its just supercharged, bet other things have been done as well. If you'd told me the figures i would have thought its a fast as f*ck. By the videos i can see that! But i wont be selling the scooby for a saxo whether it supercharged, turbocharged or both! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now